IHE PaLM TF 9.0 source documents are in : Given the work in SDC, PaLM should reach out to this IHE domain (QRPH) to learn more. In the future, this is something for the CAP’s eCC to consider. The BRIDG model federates out the technical resource requirements and provides a framework for modeling information that isn’t constrained. The BRIDG is a different philosophy from the current eCC. The eCC new structure will be released in SDC. We would need to separate the different requirements of data content from the data presentation / structure. The eCC has specific sequence in their XML, which constrains the end user based on how the vendors implement them. The eCC has list of data elements that are required, but they can be displayed as desired locally, and create different views of the report. An issue is with the receiving applications more so than the sending applications.Ī next step would be to check to see how APSR 2.1 fits with the electronic cancer checklists (eCC) from the CAP (and also the templates from APSR 1.0). In Europe a lot of the countries already have some solution for cancer registry reporting – similar to clinical chemistry reporting. MIPS is currently looking at it but has no concrete plan. Riki will follow up with them.ĪPSR 1.0 had no implementers to date. HL7 SD is working with the CDC on Healthcare Associated Infection reporting using C-CDA – we need to follow up with them why they did not want to use XD-Lab. The question was asked on how can we capture additional information about temperature of the processing step = do we need to add additional entries to the procedure step – No – is there a need to use the clinical lab observation in the problem organizer? It was recommended to maybe submit a comment to include observation in the procedure step. The XML representation of examples show that better now.
The APSR overview resulted in simplification of the representation of the problem organizer and the procedure step. APSR 2.1 is meant to apply to any structured report in anatomic or cytologic pathology that is CDA-based.
#Glims mips pdf#
The pdf format is generated from pubswiki. The formal machine-processable specification is maintained within ART-DÉCOR, and it is then complemented with additional text within the new IHE mediawiki server created for that purpose. – it will be the first IHE profile produced without the conventional word processing (Office).
#Glims mips trial#
As a consequence it will be released for Trial Implementation as APSR 2.1. This process allowed to correct some issues and bring a few refinements to the APSR 2 specification. The Trial Implementation version in preparation is here: įor the past two months François, Gunter, Riki and JD conducted a harmonization process between APSR 2.0 and the HL7 BRIDG model to be out for ballot in September. Publication of new release 9.0 of PaLM TF:įrancois presented Volumes 1 and 2a, 2b,2c, 2x (contains common specifications to most profiles) and the CPs integrated into this new release. Introductions were given and the agenda for the meeting was reviewed by Francois. PRESENTATIONS LISTED BELOW IN ITALIC'S ARE LOCATED ON THE GOOGLE DRIVE FOLDER LISTED ABOVE UNDER "DOCUMENTS" Presentations from the face-to-face meeting are available at Attendees Back to IHE Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (PaLM) Domainīack to IHE Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (PaLM)Technical Committee Page Documents
0 kommentar(er)
